GenetixBayEST. 2009
Training · Intermediate · 2 min read

SCROG: screen of green

SCROG uses a horizontal net 20–40 cm above the pots to spread a few plants into a flat, even canopy: shoots are tucked under the net through veg and early stretch, then allowed to grow up through it. It suits small rooms and plant-count limits, at the cost of longer veg. Fill about 70–80 % of the net before flipping, since plants stretch to fill the rest.

Grower practice
Draft: awaiting expert review Updated
VegTransitionFlowerAny system

Short answer. Fix a net (5–10 cm / 2–4 in squares) 20–40 cm (8–16 in) above the pots. Through veg, tuck every shoot that pokes through back under, sideways, so the plant spreads across the screen. Flip to 12/12 when the net is ~70–80 % full; tuck for the first ~2 weeks of stretch, then let tops grow up. Below the net, strip small shaded growth (lollipopping). SCROG makes few plants fill a space evenly, which helps under plant-count limits; it trades extra veg time and labour for that. Head-to-head yield vs SOG is not published; light and canopy evenness drive both [1][3].

How to do it

  1. Top once or twice, then LST the branches outward (topping, LST).
  2. Install the net before the plant reaches it; make it taut and level.
  3. Tuck daily or every other day; always tuck sideways along the net.
  4. Flip at 70–80 % fill; tuck for 10–14 days of stretch.
  5. Around day 21 of flower, remove growth below the net that gets little light.
  6. A second net 20–30 cm higher supports heavy colas.

Numbers that matter

Item Typical
Net height above pots 20–40 cm (8–16 in)
Net mesh 5–10 cm (2–4 in)
Plants per m² 1–4 (1 per 0.25–1 m²)
Veg time 4–8 weeks depending on pot size and space
Fill at flip ~70–80 %
Stretch Many cultivars stretch 1.5–2.5× after flip (Grower practice)

Common mistakes

  • Flipping with a full net, then running out of space in stretch.
  • Tucking upward or twisting stems.
  • Leaving dense, dark growth under the net (larf and mould risk).
  • Too few plants for the space under a plant-count-free setup (longer veg = more power).

Evidence

The canopy-light rationale is Supported [1]; planting density strongly affects yield per area and uniformity [2][3]. SCROG technique and fill rules are Grower practice.

Questions this article answers

How does SCROG work?

SCROG (screen of green) works by fixing a horizontal net above the pots and tucking every shoot that pokes through back under it, sideways, throughout veg. The plant spreads across the screen into a flat, even canopy where all the tops sit in good light. After the flip, growers keep tucking for about two weeks of stretch, then let the tops grow up through the net.

How high should the SCROG net be?

Set a SCROG net about 20-40 cm (8-16 in) above the pots, with mesh squares of 5-10 cm (2-4 in). Install it taut and level before the plant reaches it. For heavy colas, a second net about 20-30 cm higher adds support in flower. Below the net, strip small shaded growth around day 21 of flower to reduce larf and mould risk.

When do I flip a SCROG to flower?

Flip a SCROG to 12/12 when the net is about 70-80% full. Many cultivars stretch 1.5-2.5 times after the flip, and that stretch fills the remaining space; flipping with a full net leaves you out of room. Keep tucking sideways for the first 10-14 days of stretch, then let the tops grow up through the screen.

SCROG vs SOG: which yields more?

No published head-to-head trial shows whether SCROG or SOG yields more. In both, light and canopy evenness drive yield, and research shows planting density strongly affects yield per area and cannabinoid uniformity. SCROG gets a few plants, about 1-4 per m², to fill a space, which suits plant-count limits but adds veg time and labour.

How many plants for a SCROG?

A SCROG typically uses 1-4 cannabis plants per square metre, or one plant per 0.25-1 m², with 4-8 weeks of veg depending on pot size and space. Fewer plants means longer veg to fill the net, which suits plant-count limits but costs more time and power. Where plant numbers aren't limited, using too few plants for the space is a common mistake.

Sources

  1. Rodriguez-Morrison V, Llewellyn D, Zheng Y, 2021. Cannabis yield, potency, and leaf photosynthesis respond differently to increasing light levels in an indoor environment. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:646020. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.646020
  2. Danziger N, Bernstein N, 2022. Too dense or not too dense: higher planting density reduces cannabinoid uniformity but increases yield/area in drug-type medical cannabis. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:713481. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.713481
  3. Backer R, Schwinghamer T, Rosenbaum P, et al., 2019. Closing the yield gap for cannabis: a meta-analysis of factors determining cannabis yield. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:495. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00495

Was this helpful?

Tell us by joining the waitlist: Founding Members shape what the Professor writes next.

Professor Greenleaf

Grow with the Professor.

The GenetixBay community is coming: honest grow journals, permanent GB-IDs for genetics, and a Professor who answers with citations. Founding Members get first access and the lowest numbers in the archive.